1. Parties вЂ” class official certification вЂ” appellate review of grant of official certification. вЂ” The supreme court reviews a test court’s grant of course official certification under an abuse-of-discretion standard.
2. Parties вЂ” class official certification вЂ” six requirements for official certification. вЂ” The six criteria for course official certification are set out in Ark.R.Civ.P. 23(a) and b that is(: (1) numerosity; (2) commonality; (3) typicality; (4) adequacy; (5) predominance; and (6) superiority.
3. Parties вЂ” class official certification вЂ” elements of adequacy requirement. вЂ” the court that is supreme interpreted Ark.R.Civ.P. 23(a)(4), which involves adequacy, to need three elements: (1) the representative counsel must certanly be qualified, skilled and generally speaking in a position to conduct the litigation; (2) there should be no proof of collusion or conflicting interest between your agent together with course; and (3) the agent must show some minimal amount of desire for the action, knowledge of the practices challenged, and power to help in decision-making as to your conduct of this litigation. Continue reading →